Tuesday 5 February 2013

Blogging Outloud - danah boyd


Previously, as influenced by our discussion of Rebecca Blood, the internet has become a clutter of information, which danah boyd would argue is partly due to the introduction of blogs.

Blogging Outloud: Shifts in Public Voice - danah boyd

In the talk given by danah boyd at  LITA Conference, she makes the link between librarians and blogs. She states that librarians were the “gatekeepers of information”. However, blogging changed the conception of knowledge because now more people were providing information.
Once the internet began the dissemination of information, Google became the place to access information without a gatekeeper, filtering through to relevant information based on what you are looking for.

Blogs as Sources of Information
 
Blogs are not attempting to be strictly information based, they are people’s own interpretations of information, feelings and ideas.
boyd discusses how bloggers are mainly disregarded as amateur journalists, when they aren’t trying to be; or the people are actually trying to give decent and reliable information are clumped into the group of people who aren’t
  • There is a difference between opinions and news - many blogs are simply people’s personal accounts of information, which are not intended to be considered news. However, there are some citizens who practice their right in participatory journalism and are providing accurate accounts of information.
  • This can correspond to Blood’s distinction between filter-style and journal-style blogs

What is a Blog?

boyd makes the relation of blogs to paper
Secondary orality instead of a form of literacy
  • Secondary Orality
  • Doesn’t have to be edited, but it the flow of our thought process and individuals simply coming forward with their interests and information
  • The goal is to share and get thoughts across, it is not about publishing
People are trying to form blogging into something that it’s not
  • It’s simply an avenue to express an opinion
  • “Free style blogs are nothing less than an outbreak of self-expression” Rebecca Blood
Blogging and public/private
  • Personal interests and opinions are no longer private information, they are put online to display to the world
  • Bloggers are aware that what they are saying is very public, even if we don’t have the mentality to understand just how public it is
Blogging as communication
  • “No physical bodies, only traces of communication”
  • Blogging represents part of the ways that boundaries are broken down between people and nations
  • “Blogs are generating huge archives of contemporary culture”
  • Personal lives are being stored online for future generations to see, just as letters, journals and diaries were kept from the 18th century
  • Currently, libraries are our archives where we learn about previous generations, but in the future the internet will be the archives in which people learn about our generation.

Blogging versus Librarians - Information Access
  • boyd is suggesting that librarians believe Google is the enemy as they are trying to give out information as it is free, but the librarians want to “win back their rightful place as the guardians of the world’s knowledge”
  • boyd believes that librarians should not be the sole gatekeepers to access; as more people begin to work on freeing information, the more cultural and structural access to information can be maximized
  • Computers changed the norm where librarians acted as the filterers of information - determining what was valuable and providing access to that
  • Now, librarians’ judgements are no longer needed
  • People are given the opportunity to be their own gatekeepers - the concept of “valuable” information has drastically changed - we can now filter through all the information provided to us and deem what is valuable on our own accord
  • On the negative side, librarians were a human account, making it easier to establish a relationship between information and people; relating this to Google, it is simply a search engine full of information that may or may not be relevant, making it a lot more difficult to filter through
    • Most of us experience this in our own library - many times it is much easier to go to the librarians to help us filter through the masses of information online rather than trying to search through ourselves.
  • boyd is saying that because technology is so prevalent and has “changed the rules of the game”, that a people-centric view is essential
  • Blogging is a crucial aspect of this as 30-40,000 blogs and over 500,000 new posts are created per day
  • Blogging as self-produced content, boyd describes as being overwhelming because it is difficult to find relevant or desired information – blogs clog the pages on Google searches
    • As Rebecca Blood emphasizes, “the need for reliable filters will become more pressing” Weblogs: A History and Perspective
    • Example; searching danah boyd on Google doesn’t include her academic work, but her blog posts



Affordances of the Blog
  • Giving people the opportunity to personally or critically engage with a topic
  • Also acting as a space for people to connect through niche interests
  • Acting as an archive for common, everyday life
  • As a form of citizen media (hyperlink to blog about citizen media)

Critique of boyd
  • Uses the internet and blogs as interchangeable terms
  • Her discussion of the relationship between librarians and blogs doesn’t coherently flow with her overall debate
  • Ultimately stating that there is a need for a filtration system, but without a top down system
  • Relates to the fact that this all results in participatory culture

Workshop
  • Find a blog about "Occupy Wall Street" which you feel provides the most valuable information on the topic.

Tuesday 22 January 2013

Internet as the Public Sphere

As Communication students, I know all of us have studied the public sphere a million times, but I couldn't resist talking about Poor's essay, "Mechanisms of an Online Public Sphere".
He raises a lot of good points on a discussion I think is incredibly relevant to what we're studying in this class and in Comm studies in general.

I don't know about you, but I've found almost every single one of my classes has incorporated the Internet into the discussion. Obviously this is important because the Internet is such a huge part of our society today, it's just difficult when it's so new and we can't possibly know the full effects of it, and I'm not sure we ever will.
I took a course entitled Networked Publics last semester, which basically surrounded this entire topic. I definitely don't consider myself an expert now, but I do seem to have developed some pretty strong opinions on it! I know this is such a new discussion though so I'm open to different interpretations!

In my opinion, the Internet has become a new social space - I've found that a lot of people are finding participation in the online space more important than participation in the physical space. And to me, that's just wrong. I totally support the Internet and believe there are a lot of great things that come out of it, but I do not think it is a space that can create change.
Something I found interesting is that Poor left out a key aspect of Habermas' public sphere, and that is it's ability to enforce change. Habermas said that these spaces of political discourse, in order to be effective had to bring about or influence change in the public realm.
This is a huge part that I think the Internet lacks on it's own. In order for any real social change to occur, there has to be action in the physical space, the streets. This is the only way people will actually pay attention. (Now, I'm not including things like denial of service attacks by hacktivist groups, because they are only a small portion of the population). A lot of people give credit to the Internet for the creation of Occupy Wall Street, however, the only way it was effective was the fact that there was physical action in the streets. Movements like this can only demonstrate their efforts if they are literally in people's faces - if it only remains online, it's so easy for people to close their computer and ignore it. (Now, the issue of whether or not OWS was actually effective is another discussion entirely).
Given all of this, however, I do believe it is possible for the Internet to become an effective public sphere, but right now, it is too large and too global to be able to enforce any real change on its own.
While I want to keep this short, I do want to say that there definitely are exceptions, which makes me think that there is potential. I wrote a paper about the use of the Internet and Social Media in the Egyptian Uprising and found that it was a defining factor in the success of the protests. But once again, it mainly acted as a space for people to coordinate; they still had to protest in the physical space in order for their voices to be heard.

Overall, I think the website Slashdot is a good example of the potential for an online public sphere. Their process of moderation and their qualifications for users and scoring process is very unique and makes it an effective space. However, it can also be argued that this creates a space that is not easily accessible to all.

Laurier Blogs

Here's a list of all the blogs in our class! CS400H-A

Elyse S.
http://citizenmediaandthepublicsphere.blogspot.ca/

Monica G
http://cs400-monica.blogspot.ca

Shane M
http://mcka3590.blogspot.ca/

Val C
http://cs400-citizenmedia.blogspot.ca

Ben B
http://benbelluz.wordpress.com/

Alison B
http://bend6580.wordpress.com/

Sasha C
http://sashacampbell19.wordpress.com/

David M
http://davidmiller13.blogspot.ca

Jessica T
http://tess7570.wordpress.com

Jennifer N
http://naha8520.blogspot.ca

Adam A
http://adamabelson.blogspot.ca/

Carley M
http://exploringcitizenmedia.wordpress.com/

Kaitlyn M
mcle0010.wordpress.com

Mike H
http://hajm0220.wordpress.com/ 

Dan G
http://dgallivan.wordpress.com/